Connect with us

Rasmussen’s recent surveys of Likely U.S. Voters could almost be accused of going out of their way to give Hillary Clinton a bunch of unwelcome numbers. Not only do Likely Democratic Voters overwhelmingly want a “fresh face” to run for president in 2020, a plurality now believe that the once-popular Clinton did more harm than good to the party. And despite all the bad press directed at Donald Trump, among all likely voters, a plurality do not believe that the country would be better off if Hillary had won.

After learning that nearly three-quarters (73%) of likely Democratic voters don’t want anyone who already ran for president to run in 2020, Rasmussen asked specifically about Hillary’s impact on the Democratic Party. The numbers weren’t good.

While Clinton was widely popular among Democrats back in 2015, that popularity has plummeted. Now a plurality of Democrats believe Hillary has been bad for the party overall: “33% think she’s been good for their party, but 39% believe she’s been bad for it instead,” Rasmussen reports.

And the numbers are far worse among Republicans and Independents: “Seventy-two percent (72%) of Republicans and, more worrisome for Democrats, 63% of voters not affiliated with either major party feel Clinton has been bad for the party.”

Rasmussen notes that even among the one-third of Democrats who say Clinton’s been good for the party, a strong majority (62%) don’t want her to run again.

Among all Likely Voters, 58% say Clinton has been bad for Democrats, with only 22% saying she’s been good and 12% maintaining that she’s had no impact.

Clinton has also apparently lost female voters, among whom an even stronger majority than men want a new candidate for the Democrats in 2020.

Then there’s Rasmussen’s recent findings on what voters think a Clinton presidency would have meant for the country: Only 40% of all likely voters believe the country would be better off today if Clinton had defeated Trump in 2016, while 47% disagree and 13% are undecided.

Advertisement
23 Comments

23 Comments

  1. Stephen Russell

    July 19, 2018 at 10:41 pm

    Numbers for Clinton should always read MINUS IE -73% vs Trump which would read +73%.
    EZ.

    • Joseph

      July 20, 2018 at 4:55 am

      Killary will probably throw her hat in the ring but I will be surprised if she would even make it to the Democratic Convention. She is a has been but her ego just won’t let her stay out of the race as she feels she deserves the Presidency in her own mind.

  2. Michael J McBride

    July 19, 2018 at 10:47 pm

    Hillary’s numbers should be on her mug shot taken as she enters prison for life.

    • Terry Anderson

      July 20, 2018 at 4:30 am

      SCORE!!! Great retort. Throw that lying bitch n prison!

  3. Andy

    July 19, 2018 at 10:59 pm

    Please , run again Hillary !!!

    • Richard Young

      July 19, 2018 at 11:57 pm

      Exactly! I want to see her get slaughtered big time.

  4. dennodogg

    July 19, 2018 at 11:15 pm

    Take the “undecided” as a no. They just don’t have the balls to say it.

  5. Rick

    July 19, 2018 at 11:23 pm

    PRISON…..

  6. CMarie Tisme

    July 20, 2018 at 12:00 am

    The DNC will do their best to keep HRC from running again – she’s proven to be the kiss of death to winning back the White House. I, however, would love to see another Trump/Hillary face off. Even at his worst, Trump trounces HRC.

  7. Michael

    July 20, 2018 at 12:54 am

    40% actually believe the country would be better of if she’d won? Wow, we still have quite a few dummies in this country.

    • Ed

      July 20, 2018 at 1:30 am

      Michael, yes, that’s the group either wearing black face bandanas or earplugs and blinders. Also the few that aren’t able to do either – ‘celebrities’ …

      Still, an alarming number of embarrassing Americans.

      • Kamkoz

        July 23, 2018 at 12:09 am

        At least the numbers weren’t
        reversed! That would be a
        Tragedy.

  8. Mary

    July 20, 2018 at 1:28 am

    If she does run and there is a debate. All she will do at the debate is put her finger to her nose to let the news people she wants to interrupt the opposing candidate talk. That is what she did the last time.

  9. Rebecca Holstine

    July 20, 2018 at 1:39 am

    Google “What is under Hillary’s jacket at the 9/26 debate” She had a wire on and I am sure some one was feeding her the answers. I saw it going up her back the night of the debate and so this evening I googled it just to see if I was right. And yes I was right.

    • Kamkoz

      July 23, 2018 at 12:11 am

      That’s why she never fully answered the questions.

  10. Dig Bick

    July 20, 2018 at 2:03 am

    RUN HILLARY RUN! Hillary, …PLEASE RUN!! I will so enjoy watching Trump, KICK YOUR LESBIAN, CARPET MUNCHING, BOOTY AGAIN!

  11. Terry Anderson

    July 20, 2018 at 4:40 am

    Dems r Broke.Their taking out loans to combat Trump.They cannot afford for Hillary to run again.
    Their Likely candidate list reads like a Socialist Horror Story
    NaziHontas Warren-Loser!
    Max Mouth Waters-RUFKM??
    Joe “The Groper”Biden-Already a 2 time Potus candidate Loser
    The DNC is n Chaos.If Lisa Page comes Clean a Lot of Dems will find themselves w Indictments for Crimes against America ,being Traitors and on the Clinton “Accidental Associate Death” list if they Squealed to save their own asses and burn Hillary and Obama.

  12. Paul G

    July 20, 2018 at 6:16 am

    ….and out of the percentage that still like her for whatever reason, 100% of them that were polled are brain dead.

  13. Nathan M.

    July 20, 2018 at 8:07 am

    Hillary’s been pulling every connection she can (and she still has many in the MSM) to smear Trump, but the fact is that no one likes a loser.

    She’s now a two-time loser and I dearly hope the Democrats run her again in 2020 so she can hit that third strike and finally get out of the game already.

  14. mike dar

    July 20, 2018 at 12:08 pm

    Ultimately, ‘bad for the party’ is derived from, “bad for the Country”… yet 1/4 of Dems don’t seem capable of such interpretations.

  15. IAMPCBOB

    July 20, 2018 at 5:14 pm

    12% of Democrats say she has had no impact, so, according to them, the Democrat Party has ALWAYS been this bad! That’s a huge statement to make, and one WE will all agree to! The fact is, the Democrat Party has been on a downhill tumble since AT LEAST the early 60’s! I know since I was there then, voting Republican! I’ve seen it all!

  16. Kris

    July 21, 2018 at 9:51 am

    Hilarity has fallen and can’t get elected!

  17. Kamkoz

    July 23, 2018 at 12:15 am

    She needs to be shamed so severely, that her, and her entourage, all crawl into a corner never to be heard from again. The lies and dishonesty that continues to spew from her lips is ridiculous at best.

    You know its bad when people believe a foreign government official over her. I, for one, do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CF