Connect with us

Published

on

On Thursday, the editor of the website uncoverdc.com decided to post an anonymous letter from a purported professor at that bastion of leftism, the University of California, Berkeley, that challenged the “BLM (Black Lives Matter) narrative.” The editor, Tracy Beanz, wrote:

I was sent this and felt the need to share it to a wider audience on Twitter. I shared a link to the original post in the tweet. Then, the post was removed, and I made the decision that this is an important perspective not given an equal share in the marketplace of ideas. It is for this reason that UncoverDC now publishes it, not only because it is newsworthy, but because it is a critical piece of history. Wilfred Reilly, mentioned in the letter alongside Thomas Sowell, retweeted my original tweet confirming that he personally received the email, thus verifying its credibility.

Internationally famed economist Thomas Sowell was awarded the National Humanities Medal by President George W. Bush for prolific scholarship combining history, economics, and political science; he was awarded the Bradley Prize for intellectual achievement. Wilfred Reilly, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Kentucky State University, is the author of “Hate Crime Hoax: How the Left is Selling a Fake Race War” and has openly challenged and debated members of the alt-right.

The letter, a whopping 2,411 words long and addressed to professors “X, Y, Z,” takes issue harshly with the narrative that “problems in the black community are caused by whites,” noting prominent black voices such as Reilly’s or famed economist Thomas Sowell’s have also objected to the narrative: “They are intelligent scholars who reject a narrative that strips black people of agency and systematically externalizes the problems of the black community onto outsiders. Their view is entirely absent from the departmental and UCB-wide communiques.”

The writer notes, “If we claim that the criminal justice system is white-supremacist, why is it that Asian Americans, Indian Americans, and Nigerian Americans are incarcerated at vastly lower rates than white Americans? This is a funny sort of white supremacy.”

The writer continues:

None of this is addressed in your literature. None of this is explained, beyond hand-waving and ad hominems. “Those are racist dogwhistles”. “The model minority myth is white supremacist”. “Only fascists talk about black-on-black crime”, ad nauseam. These types of statements do not amount to counterarguments: they are simply arbitrary offensive classifications, intended to silence and oppress discourse. Any serious historian will recognize these for the silencing orthodoxy tactics they are, common to suppressive regimes, doctrines, and religions throughout time and space. They are intended to crush real diversity and permanently exile the culture of robust criticism from our department. Increasingly, we are being called upon to comply and subscribe to BLM’s problematic view of history, and the department is being presented as unified on the matter.

The writer expresses their fear of stating their opinions publicly:

I personally don’t dare speak out against the BLM narrative, and with this barrage of alleged unity being mass-produced by the administration, tenured professoriat, the UC administration, corporate America, and the media, the punishment for dissent is a clear danger at a time of widespread economic vulnerability. I am certain that if my name were attached to this email, I would lose my job and all future jobs, even though I believe in and can justify every word I type.

Then, this: “The vast majority of violence visited on the black community is committed by black people. There are virtually no marches for these invisible victims, no public silences, no heartfelt letters from the UC regents, deans, and departmental heads. The message is clear: Black lives only matter when whites take them. Black violence is expected and insoluble, while white violence requires explanation and demands solution.”

Continuing: “Please look into your hearts and see how monstrously bigoted this formulation truly is. No discussion is permitted for non-black victims of black violence, who proportionally outnumber black victims of non-black violence.”

More: “The claim that black interracial violence is the product of redlining, slavery, and other injustices is a largely historical claim. It is for historians, therefore, to explain why Japanese internment or the massacre of European Jewry hasn’t led to equivalent rates of dysfunction and low SES performance among Japanese and Jewish Americans respectively. Arab Americans have been viciously demonized since 9/11, as have Chinese Americans more recently. However, both groups outperform white Americans on nearly all SES indices – as do Nigerian Americans, who incidentally have black skin.”

Discussing politics: “The patronizing and condescending attitudes of Democrat leaders towards the black community, exemplified by nearly every Biden statement on the black race, all but guarantee a perpetual state of misery, resentment, poverty, and the attendant grievance politics which are simultaneously annihilating American political discourse and black lives. And yet, donating to BLM is bankrolling the election campaigns of men like Mayor Frey, who saw their cities devolve into violence. This is a grotesque capture of a good-faith movement for necessary police reform, and of our department, by a political party. Even worse, there are virtually no avenues for dissent in academic circles. I refuse to serve the Party, and so should you.”

Invoking Dr. Martin Luther King: “MLK would likely be called an Uncle Tom if he spoke on our campus today. We are training leaders who intend, explicitly, to destroy one of the only truly successful ethnically diverse societies in modern history.”

An acknowledgement: “It shouldn’t affect the strength of my argument above, but for the record, I write as a person of color.”

And this: “I hope you appreciate the frustration behind this message. I do not support BLM. I do not support the Democrat grievance agenda and the Party’s uncontested capture of our department. I do not support the Party co-opting my race, as Biden recently did in his disturbing interview, claiming that voting Democrat and being black are isomorphic.”

The complete letter is here.

Advertisement
2 Comments
  • Lisa Balla Millar says:

    The BLM is a bad organization for the blacks. They do nothing to help them but only incite them. Why aren’t they going into black neighborhoods and helping them out and teaching them to raise their kids right and to learn a little respect and to improve their life style. Most of the racism is for trashy, criminal and undesirable blacks who are an embarrassment to blacks who know respect and have made something out of their lives. I know a lot of white people who have black friends; I have at least a dozen. Of course, they are the N-type blacks they are unruly and just plane thugs.

  • MICHAEL MCPOLAND says:

    Blacks did not get here by themselves. Sadly and tragically, they were captured by rival tribes in Africa and sold to Dutch slave traders and taken to the West Indies and Cuba. Then the English and Americans began their own slave trade which brought the slaves to America. The Arabs had been dealing in the slave trade for hundreds of years prior to the Dutch. The Romans had black slaves as well. In fact, there has been slavery since apes started walking upright and creating a language. Ergo, humans.

  • CF
    >