Connect with us

One of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s biggest findings in his final report was that Ukrainian businessman Konstantin Kilimnik had ties to Russian intelligence and worked for Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

Thanks to The Hill’s John Solomon, we just learned that Kilimnik is far from the dastardly, Kremlin-linked shady character he is described as in Mueller’s report. In fact, Kilimnik was a “sensitive” intelligence source who worked for years for the U.S. State Department. This information did not appear in Mueller’s report, but Kilimnik’s ties to Russian intelligence were mentioned on page 6. “The FBI assesses” Kilimnik “to have ties to Russian intelligence,” the report said of Kilimnik.

As Solomon reported, after reviewing “hundreds of pages of government documents – which special counsel Robert Mueller possessed since 2018,” Kilimnik was not just any State Department source:

He interacted with the chief political officer at the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, sometimes meeting several times a week to provide information on the Ukraine government. He relayed messages back to Ukraine’s leaders and delivered written reports to U.S. officials via emails that stretched on for thousands of words, the memos show.

The FBI knew all of this, well before the Mueller investigation concluded.

Solomon further reported that Kilimnik was so valued as a source for the State Department that his name was not included in “cables” so that he couldn’t be included in any WikiLeaks hacks. Alan Purcell, who was the chief political officer at the embassy in Kiev between 2014 and 2017, apparently “described what he considered an unusual level of discretion that was taken with handling Kilimnik,” according to an FBI interview reviewed by Solomon. That same interview stated: “Normally the head of the political section would not handle sources, but Kasanof informed Purcell that KILIMNIK was a sensitive source.”

For example, Kilimnik would provide the State Department with information regarding Ukraine’s opposition bloc, which sometimes would be sent immediately to the ambassador. And it was not just the U.S. that relied on Kilimnik. Other Western governments apparently worked with Kilimnik as well.

“One time, in a meeting with the Italian embassy, Purcell heard the Italian ambassador echo a talking point that was strikingly familiar to the point Kilimnik had shared with Purcell,” an FBI report reviewed by Solomon stated.

Kilimnik’s work as a U.S. informant began in 2012 or 2013, providing information about former Ukraine President Viktor Yanukovych’s administration. This is where Manafort’s ties come in. Kilimnik worked for Manafort’s lobbying firm, which had been hired by Yanukovych’s Party of Regions.

The FBI wrote in one of the documents that a former U.S. Embassy political officer met with Kilimnik “a least bi-weekly and occasionally multiple times in the same week,” which was done outside the embassy to keep Kilimnik’s name off the books.

“State officials told the FBI that although Kilimnik had Ukrainian and Russian residences, he did not appear to hold any allegiance to Moscow and was critical of Russia’s invasion of the Crimean territory of Ukraine,” Solomon reported.

Yet if one only knew about Kilimnik from Mueller’s report, one might think he was a Putin loyalist.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. Shea O

    June 9, 2019 at 5:52 pm

    Something smells here. Gonna get ugly!

  2. ProudHillbilly

    June 9, 2019 at 6:07 pm

    I was about halfway through the report when news broke that they had deceptively edited transcripts. After that, why bother to suffer through the rest?

  3. Mary McClane

    June 9, 2019 at 6:56 pm

    That report is not worth the paper it’s printed on even though it cost the American taxpayers 32 million dollars! Disgusting.

  4. yankeeyob

    June 9, 2019 at 8:02 pm

    Maybe some of the “Russian assets” did work for Putin, but they also worked for Hillary, at least on the days they were helping frame the Trumpsters

  5. fred H SMITH

    June 9, 2019 at 8:59 pm

    Democrats coming up with more pie on heir face…..they never seem to learn to let go the more they dig the worse they look………………………..NOW Rep.Cummins has problems with tax evasion, miss-handling of charitable funds and then lying and blaming it all on his wife as if he had no idea what she was doing,,,,like to CLinton foundaion

  6. Sue

    June 9, 2019 at 9:08 pm

    How ironic that the democrats so quickly stated that AG Barr’s reputation was smeared since he was now a “trump attorney.” We knew all along that Mueller was out to get President Trump. Now we have proof that Mueller and all of Clinton’s minions doctored a report that we, Americans, paid $32 million dollars for. This doesn’t surprise me for a second. I’m just glad we have honest reputable people bringing all of this information out from under the rocks.

  7. LST

    June 9, 2019 at 9:43 pm

    The more I learn of Mueller, the bigger the asshole he becomes, and I thought from the very beginning he’s an asshole. Now I believe he’s ten times the asshole I ever thought he was.

  8. Polly

    June 9, 2019 at 10:00 pm

    This man needs to come clean.Starting to.look like death warmed over

  9. Average American

    June 9, 2019 at 10:08 pm

    When is Mueller’s role in the Uranium One scandal going to be exposed and just how much money he make off of that?

  10. Rebecca Holstine

    June 9, 2019 at 10:18 pm

    I told my hubby the first time I saw Mueller, he had evil eyes. Well, my opinion has not changed for sure. I want a refund on this report. Not worth one thin dime.

  11. Gayle

    June 10, 2019 at 9:13 am

    The President is right again! The entire Mueller investigation was a witch hunt! It was fabricated by he demo-RATS, Comey and the top of the FBI and DOJ! All these people committed treason!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CF