Connect with us

Published

on

A pair of Obama-era operatives are launching a massive digital advertisement buy ahead of the 2020 election to ward off what they said is President Donald Trump’s online dominance.

A nonprofit group called Acronym and a left-leaning political action committee are unveiling plans to spend $75 million on digital advertising to rebut what they said is Trump’s nearly insurmountable edge in battleground states, according to The New York Times on Monday. A pair of Obama-era operatives are involved in the plan.

“If the things that need to happen don’t happen in these battleground states between now and May or June, our nominee will never have time to catch up,” David Plouffe, who managed former President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign and was a key adviser to him in 2012, told reporters.

Plouffe, a member of the Acronym board, said Trump is way ahead of the game. “There is an enormous amount of danger between now and then,” he said, noting that Obama had a similar advantage over Sen. Mitt Romney in 2012. “If the hole is too steep to dig out of, they’re not going to win.”

The president’s campaign already plowed over $26 million so far into Facebook and Google, a number dwarfing that of former Vice President Joe Biden, as well as Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, all of whom are running for president in 2020.

Tara McGowan, the founder and chief executive of Acronym who was also a digital producer for Obama for America in 2011, said alongside Plouffe in an interview that their campaign would begin immediately and focus on crafting a negative public perception of Trump before the primary election concludes.

McGowan was also a digital director for NextGen Action, a group started by billionaire Tom Steyer, who is himself running for president as a Democrat. Acronym’s campaign will focus on four big states: Michigan, Arizona, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, a state that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton famously avoided during her failed 2016 run.

Trump’s advertisement spending is a problem for Democrats, but so is his ability to attract an immense amount of free media.

Democratic candidates picked up a combined 58 million social media interactions on features, articles and stories about them, Axios reported Saturday, citing data from NewsWhip. Trump collected about 181 million, data show. Trump is also raising money every time he raises the ire of media pundits.

Trump’s campaign, for instance, sold more than 55,000 packs of plastic straws, netting over $823,000 in sales, while campaign officials have sold about $50,000 worth of fine point markers, TheNYT reported in September. The campaign began selling markers in September to raise money after CNN criticized him for supposedly using a pen on a weather map.

Advertisement
13 Comments
  • Bj says:

    They can spend a trillion dollars and run as many ads as they want Trump will still win. Soros poured money into Clinton’s campaign last time……..she outspent him 10 to 1 and it didn’t help her at all. If Biden or Warren is the nominee it’s all over before it even starts. They have NOTHING to offer……nothing. The only way they can try to win is by cheating. Bringing in those ballots in the trunk of cars…..unverified like they did last time in Florida. That democratic criminal should be prosecuted.

  • Evangeline says:

    When will the Dems come to realize it’s not Trump’s dominance in advertising that wins him votes. It’s who he is, it’s his passion for our country, it’s seeing who terrible the Dems have martyred him since before he even took office. Dems love to make themselves out to be victims but don’t care about the ones they actually make victims.

  • Ellen Whiting says:

    Can you imagine anyone launching a campaign like this to try to thwart Obama’s reelection in 2012? Anyone who questioned Obama’s insane anti-American policies was automatically skewered, tarred, feathered, branded a racist neo-Nazi KKK hate-monger and destroyed.

  • CF
    >