Connect with us

Published

on

Sen. Richard Burr has been sued by an investor in Wyndham Hotel stock for allegedly using Senate Intelligence Committee information to sell off his shares of the stock before their value plummeted during the coronavirus pandemic.

“Senator Burr owed a duty to Congress, the United States government, and citizens of the United States, including Plaintiff, not to use material nonpublic information that he learned by virtue of his duties as a United States Senator in connection with the sale or purchase of any security,” the lawsuit says, according to ABC News.

“Senator Burr breached that duty by selling stock, including Wyndham stock, based on that material nonpublic information.”

According to Senate disclosure forms, the North Carolina Republican, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, made 33 stock transactions on Feb. 13.

The forms do not disclose the exact value of transactions but provide a range. The sales collectively netted Burr between $628,000 and $1.72 million.

Two weeks later, Burr was recorded making ominous predictions about the impact of the coronavirus, according to NPR.

“There’s one thing that I can tell you about this: It is much more aggressive in its transmission than anything that we have seen in recent history,” the senator told a small group of constituents at a private luncheon. “It is probably more akin to the 1918 pandemic.”

Burr also told the group he met with that the use of the military would be possible and that limits on travel were likely. Neither of those possibilities were were being publicly talked about at the time.

The senator released a statement following public scrutiny of his financial disclosures and even volunteered to submit himself to a Senate Ethics Committee investigation.

“I relied solely on public news reports to guide my decision regarding the sale of stocks on February 13,” his statement said. “Specifically, I closely followed CNBC’s daily health and science reporting out of its Asia bureaus at the time.

“Understanding the assumption many could make in hindsight however, I spoke this morning with the chairman of the Senate Ethics Committee and asked him to open a complete review of the matter with full transparency.”

Former federal prosecutor Thomas P. O’Brien filed the lawsuit on behalf of an investor named Alan D. Jacobson. O’Brien told ABC News that the civic case could provide a remedy for investors who believe the senator had an unfair advantage when he sold the stock.

“The senator made an unusual trade,” O’Brien said. “Our client was one of many people who traded without benefit of information that the senator had.”

The lawsuit says that Burr also violated the STOCK Act, a 2012 law that prevents senators from using inside information to guide their investments. Burr voted against the legislation, according to ABC News.

Despite Burr’s denial of the allegations against him, some ethical experts maintain authorities should look into the classified briefings Burr had access to during that time.

Republican ethics lawyer Matthew Sanderson said Burr’s claim that he sold off his stocks because of media reports on the coronavirus outbreak does not explain why other investors did not also act on the reporting at the time.

“To me that doesn’t hold any water,” Sanderson said.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
10 Comments
  • Daniel Brofford says:

    The difference between a republican and a democrat is the republican wants for everyone who commits a crime to pay for it.

    • Jesus Christos says:

      …As long as they are not conservative, republican, or regressive. Projection is not truth. Republicans protect their own where democrats and liberals hold people to a standard.

  • MJ says:

    Dianne Feinstein should also be sued, she and two others were also guilty! They are all crooked! Above the law!

    • RockyMtn 1776 says:

      Nothing of merit will be done to any of them. They protect each other regardless of party when it comes to money.
      Voters don’t care, they keep re-electing the same crooks for years .

      • Intellectual Impaler says:

        No they don’t. They protect members of their own Party not each other. More Republicans are indicted for bogus charges compared to factual charges against Democrats. The only reason for that is because the Bar is a conclave of Democrats and they look for Liberal judges to try the cases to guarantee a result.

  • Intellectual Impaler says:

    3 others did. Where are the investigations on them? Why isn’t there investigations when we found out the first time about our “representatives” using their office to do insider trading years ago? Where are the investigations of how the members of the House go from poor to rich as soon as they get in office? Wouldn’t this be under RICO?

  • Intellectual Impaler says:

    “I relied solely on public news reports to guide my decision regarding the sale of stocks on February 13,” his statement said.

    Republican ethics lawyer Matthew Sanderson said Burr’s claim that he sold off his stocks because of media reports on the coronavirus outbreak does not explain why other investors did not also act on the reporting at the time.

    Because most people don’t know how to trade and are locked in some sort of retirement plan that prevents access to sell. There have been numerous outlets that have beat the recession drum long before this outbreak. So why haven’t those who know how to trade sell off when the Media started that drum beat months ago?

  • Pat says:

    I think he sold and then caused panic with what he told Americans, and I bet anything that he’s back in the market buying low!! What a squirrel! He needs to go!!

  • Don says:

    They are all damn crook… none care for tax payer. we, people who pay tax for these asshole, bitches

  • Stephen Russell says:

    Hooray, awesome, take down bravo. shake up Senate & House some 2

  • CF
    >