Connect with us



Well, well, well, the Trump-hating former New Jersey circuit court judge who masquerades as a “constitutional legal expert” on Fox News is now facing some very, very serious allegations.

A new lawsuit was just filed in a New Jersey court, stating Judge Andrew Napolitano sexually assaulted a young man at his home back in the 1980s.

According to the suit, a young man named Charles Corbishley was facing arson charges, when his attorney told him he was “friends” with Judge Napolitano and that he could “fix” the case for him.

He then told the young man to go “shovel snow” at Judge Napolitano’s house. According to the lawsuit, that’s where the sexual assault took place.

From New York Daily News:

Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano sexually abused a man accused of arson in his court in the 1980s, a shocking lawsuit charged Friday.

The federal lawsuit filed by South Carolina resident Charles Corbishley alleges that Napolitano attacked him at a Hackensack, N.J. home.

Corbishley seeks $10 million under the New Jersey Child Victims Act.

“You know, you could be going away for a long time,” Napolitano allegedly told Corbishely, who was 20 years old at the time, according to the lawsuit.

Napolitano, who was wearing a trench coat, then told Corbishley to “be a good boy” and forced him to “perform fellatio on the Honorable Andrew Napolitano, the presiding Justice on his criminal case,” the suit states.

“At this moment, Plaintiff was paralyzed with fear. He wanted desperately to stop Defendant Napolitano’s sexual assault, but he was terrified about what Judge Napolitano would do to him if he resisted or fought back,” the lawsuit continues.

After the encounter, Napolitano sentenced Corbishley to probation and community service — no jail time. The suit notes that Corbishley’s co-defendant in the arson case was sentenced to several years in prison.

Corbishley later violated his probation but Napolitano treated him with unusual leniency, granting a motion to vacate the probation in its entirety in 1992, the suit said.

  • Suzanne Russell says:

    If there are no other accounts against him, I would seriously doubt it’s true. But a person can make a mistake and then never go that way again. If this is something he really did, he needs to make things right with the person. I don’t like the Judge’s politics now because he used to be so even handed. Now days he’s more left than anything. But I don’t think it’s right to judge completely till you know all the facts.

  • Icorps 1970 says:

    He was pretty good till the powers that be fired him. Then when rehired he came back as hard core commie.

  • Richard Jones says:

    As far as this accusation against the judge goes, it would be highly unusual if it were a one-off event. With that in mind, has there ever been any hints of, or accusations of, this kind of behaviour in the past 40 years? This type of abuse of power would be a behavioural pattern that would have manifested itself over the years. I’m very suspect of this story without some real evidence other than an accusation.

  • CF