Connect with us



A U.S. appeals court handed President Donald Trump a victory in his effort to ban most transgender people from the military, ordering a judge to reconsider her ruling against the policy, which the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed to take effect.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday set aside a ruling by U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman in Seattle, which said the ban likely violated the constitutional rights of transgender service members and recruits.

Without ruling on the merits, a three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based appeals court said Pechman did not give the military’s judgment enough deference, and ordered her to give it more.

That finding could strengthen Trump’s position, though the government still had the burden of justifying his policy.

Sharon McGowan, legal director of Lambda Legal, which represents opponents of the ban, said she believed the decision foreshadowed the eventual “vindication of the constitutional right of the transgender service members who have been harmed by this policy.”

The U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Pechman is one of four federal judges to rule against Trump’s policy toward transgender military personnel.

In January, the Supreme Court, which has a 5-4 conservative majority, lifted lower court injunctions against the policy, while allowing legal challenges to continue.

Trump, a Republican, announced the transgender ban in July 2017, saying the military needed to focus on “decisive and overwhelming victory” without being burdened by the “tremendous medical costs and disruption” of having transgender personnel.

The move marked an about-face from a landmark policy announced in 2016 by Democratic President Barack Obama, which let transgender people serve without fear of being discharged, and receive medical care to transition genders.

In March 2018, Trump backed a revised policy from then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis that disqualified most transgender people with a history of gender dysphoria from military service, and people who have undergone gender transition steps.

Medical experts define gender dysphoria as distress from the internal conflict between physical gender and gender identity.

The policy also allowed those military personnel diagnosed with gender dysphoria under Obama’s policy to serve according to their gender identity.

The following month, Pechman extended her injunction to the revised policy, finding no evidence that transgender troops reduced the military’s effectiveness, and saying the ban undermined the dignity of those troops.

On Friday, the appeals court said the revised policy “discriminates on the basis of transgender status” but was nevertheless “significantly different” from the 2017 ban.

“On the current record,” the court said, “a presumption of deference is owed, because the 2018 policy appears to have been the product of independent military judgment.”

The government, nevertheless, still bore the burden of showing the policy significantly furthered its important interests, “and that is not a trivial burden,” the court added.

Friday’s decision relates to an August 2017 lawsuit by current and aspiring Army and Navy personnel, including one stationed overseas with nearly 20 years of experience. Washington state later joined the plaintiffs.

  • LST says:

    Let those freaks serve, as long as they’re required to wear rainbow colored uniforms with pink boots. That way, they’d be the first ones to be picked off in combat eliminating them, it’s a win-win.

  • Wilson says:

    So, now they are looking at fictional scenarios to justify their cases? It it either causes harm to them or it does not If I wack off your nads it will not “likely” cause pain, either it will or it wont depending on your tolerance. Also there is no likely in the event it will cause brain damage, they without a doubt mentally ill and it has been proven that self mutilation is another mental illness in of itself. Nonsuicidal Self-Injury.

  • Rob says:

    Put them in the front lines and send them in first. Once they learn that they don’t get to pick and choose what orders they follow. They will learn that the military is not for them. They think they can join the military and pick a office job and never have to go to combat or be at risk, yet enjoy the free or reduced medical benefits and other benefits such as a guaranteed pay check. In the end, they are a risk to the other members of the military if they are in the field.

  • Ellen Whiting says:

    The job of the military is to kill bad guys and break their stuff. Why don’t we force the military to accept recruits who weigh 800 lbs. and can’t get up off the couch? Because that would sabotage the military’s mission. Same with forcing the military to accept “transgenders.” It sabotages the military’s mission. Which is exactly what the libs want.

  • AKJohnny1 says:

    Hey… They can stop a bullet as good as the next guy…. Lol
    Give em pink camo and pink berets and stick em out front.

  • Gail Irvin says:

    There is no such thing as transgender. It is a mental condition!

  • CF