Connect with us

Published

on

Virginia Delegate Nick Freitas (R-30) took Democrats to task Friday over gun control, welfare policies, slavery, Jim Crow laws, and opposition to arming teachers for self-defense.

He rose to speak after a gun control deluge from Democrat Delegates, which was combined with a blame-game targeting Republicans.

Freitas would not have it. In fact, he offered a point-by-point rebuttal of the Democrat Party, their gun control aspirations, and the perilous position in which Democrat policies have placed generations of poor Americans and families from all socioeconomic backgrounds.

He introduced his comments on Facebook, writing, “For several days now, some Democrats in the Virginia House of Delegates have made public speeches comparing those of us who take our oath to the Constitution seriously, to include the 2nd Amendment, to Nazis and segregationists.”

He then launched into his floor speech, calling out Democrat Delegates who claimed they were in pursuit of “an open and honest debate on gun violence, school shootings, gun control, etc.”

Freitas said:

I’m certainly willing to have that debate, and I think if we were going to look seriously at school shootings and gun control we would analyze things like, ‘Why do all mass shootings seem to take place in gun-free zones’? Wouldn’t it be reasonable to test whether or not … gun-free zones have actually achieved what their … intent is? We would start to look at why most of these shooters come from broken homes. What sort of government policies have actually encouraged broken homes?

He then pointed to left-leaning think tanks that have found the “abortion industry” contributes to broken homes while conservative-leaning think tanks point to the Democrat-sponsored welfare state as perpetuating broken homes.

Freitas then suggested looking around the country at areas with the strictest gun control—mentioning Chicago and Washington, DC, among others. He said, “For some reason, [the gun control] hasn’t seemed to stop the gun violence in those particular areas.”

Freitas made clear that a debate on gun violence and school shootings should also include talk of arming certain teachers to keep students safe. He said, “Not every teacher, but a teacher that is comfortable with it. That is former law enforcement, is former military, that is now in the classroom. Delegate [Kenneth Plum (D-36)] said yesterday that was ridiculous to consider. Why? Is that because the other side of this debate will only accept one ‘solution’ to this problem? And that is tearing apart or gutting the Second Amendment?”

Freitas suggested Republicans have learned they cannot trust Democrats on gun control; that one Democrat-sponsored gun law always leads to another, and another after that, and still another after that.

He said:

I don’t think any of us on this side of the aisle believe you when you say that’s all you want to do. It’ll be bump stocks, it’ll be background checks, then it’ll be a different kind of background checks that register the guns. Then after that it’ll be that we need to ban “assault weapons.” What’s an “assault weapon?” Something that looks scary. Then after that it will be semiautomatic rifles, after that it will be semiautomatic handguns, then it will be revolvers [and] shotguns. Because when the policies fail to produce the results you are promising your constituents, you’ll be back with more reasons on why we have to infringe on Second Amendment rights.

Freitas then took on Democrats who compared Republicans to “segregationalists.” He said, “I just want to remind everybody, that it was not our party that supported slavery, that fought [against] women’s suffrage, that rounded up tens of thousands of Asian-Americans and put them in concentration camps [during World War II], that supported Jim Crow, that supported segregation or supported mass resistance. That wasn’t our party, that was the Democrat Party.”

Advertisement
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. paulette

    March 7, 2018 at 10:31 pm

    OH HELL YEA,THIS NEEDS TO GO VIRAL,I LOVE THIS GUY

  2. fashion news

    March 9, 2018 at 10:32 pm

    Definitely consider that that you said. Your favourite
    justification appeared to be on the web the simplest factor to bear in mind of.

    I say to you, I certainly get irked whilst folks consider concerns
    that they plainly do not understand about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as
    defined out the whole thing with no need side-effects , people
    can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.
    Thank you

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CF

News

Nikki Haley Breaks with Trump: ‘We Shouldn’t Have Followed Him, and We Shouldn’t Have Listened to Him’

Published

on

Nikki Haley, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, believes that former President Donald Trump “let us down.”

Haley’s remarks come as the former president’s legal team prepares to present its defense of Trump during his second impeachment trial in the Senate.

In a Politico interview published Friday, Haley, former South Carolina governor, said that “we shouldn’t have followed” Trump.

“We need to acknowledge he let us down,” she said in an extensive profile. “He went down a path he shouldn’t have, and we shouldn’t have followed him, and we shouldn’t have listened to him. And we can’t let that ever happen again.”

She also told the outlet that she has not spoken to Trump since the Jan. 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol, and takes issue with his remarks condemning former Vice President Mike Pence’s refusal to reject the Electoral College vote.

“When I tell you I’m angry, it’s an understatement,” she expressed. “I am so disappointed in the fact that [despite] the loyalty and friendship he had with Mike Pence, that he would do that to him. Like, I’m disgusted by it.”

The former ambassador, who many people are speculating may run for the White House in 2024, also added that Trump will never accept the results of the 2020 presidential election.

“There’s nothing that you’re ever going to do that’s going to make him feel like he legitimately lost the election,” she explained. “He’s got a big bully pulpit. He should be responsible with it.”

Haley also warned that many people still love the former president and will not stop supporting him just because he is out of office.

“I know how much people love Donald Trump,” she admitted. “I know it. I feel it. Whether it’s an RNC room or social media or talking to donors, I can tell you that the love they have for him is still very strong. That’s not going to just fall to the wayside. Nor do I think the Republican Party is going to go back to the way it was before Donald Trump. I don’t think it should.”

Haley added that people, instead, should “take the good that he built, leave the bad that he did, and get back to a place where we can be a good, valuable, effective party.”

“[I]t’s bigger than the party,” she insisted. “I hope our country can come together and figure out how we pull this back.”

Referring to Haley’s possible 2024 ambitions, Politico’s Tim Alberta wrote, “Since last fall, I’ve spent nearly six hours talking with Haley on-the-record. I’ve also spoken with nearly 70 people who know her: friends, associates, donors, staffers, former colleagues. From those conversations, two things are clear. First, Nikki Haley is going to run for president in 2024. Second, she doesn’t know which Nikki Haley will be on the ballot.”

Haley also said that she didn’t believe Trump had a chance of winning in a 2024 election scenario.

“I don’t think he can,” she admitted. “He’s fallen so far.”

“I think his business is suffering at this point,” she added. “I think he’s lost any sort of political viability he was going to have. I think he’s lost his social media, which meant the world to him. I mean, I think he’s lost the things that really could have kept him moving.”

Continue Reading

News

WATCH: Trump’s Defense Team Absolutely Ruins Democrats With 13 Minute Montage of “Fight” Word Like Trump Did

Published

on

The Democrats demonized President Trump for using the word ‘fight’. Trump’s attorneys responded today with a collage of clips from each of the Democrats in the room using the word ‘fight’.

This portion of today’s events on Capitol Hill was excellent. The Democrats claim that because President Trump used the word ‘fight’ in his speech on January 6th in Washington D.C. However, what every Democrat in that room forgot was that they too had used the word previously in political speech.

The montage went on for 13 minutes. (The video montage starts at 7:10 timeframe.)

Continue Reading

News

WATCH: Trump Attorneys Destroy House Managers on Lying to American Public and Using Manipulated Tweet as Evidence

Published

on

President Trump’s defense team took the floor of the US Senate on Friday in defense of President Trump in the Senate impeachment trial.

Trump Attorney David Schoen absolutely destroyed the House Managers when he took to the floor of the US Senate.

At one point Schoen played video of the Democrat lawmakers lying about a Trump tweet.

House Impeachment Manager Eric Swalwell gave a riveting performance on Wednesday reading off Trump’s tweets with emotional appeal.

During this theatrical performance, Swalwell read off a Trump retweet by Jennifer Lynn Lawrence.

But there was one problem with the tweet. It was photoshopped.

Jennifer Lynn Lawrence has never been verified by Twitter. Democrats faked that to make it look more important.

On Friday Trump Attorney David Schoen destroyed Democrats for lying about this to the American public.

WATCH:

Continue Reading

News

White House Suspends Deputy Press Secretary For Allegedly Sexually Harassing, Threatening Reporter

Published

on

The White House announced on Friday that it was suspending Deputy Press Secretary TJ Ducklo after a report surfaced alleging that he sexually harassed and threatened a female reporter who was getting ready to publish a report revealing that he was dating a reporter who had previously been tasked with covering Democrat Joe Biden.

“The confrontation began on Inauguration Day, January 20, after [Politico reporter Tara] Palmeri, a coauthor of Politico’s Playbook, contacted [Axios political reporter Alexi] McCammond for comment while one of her male colleagues left a message for Ducklo,” Vanity Fair reported. “Ducklo subsequently called a Playbook editor to object to the story, but was told to call the Playbook reporters with his concerns. But instead of calling the male reporter who initially contacted him, Ducklo tried to intimidate Palmeri by phone in an effort to kill the story. ‘I will destroy you,’ Ducklo told her, according to the sources, adding that he would ruin her reputation if she published it.”

“During the off-the-record call, Ducklo made derogatory and misogynistic comments, accusing Palmeri of only reporting on his relationship—which, due to the ethics questions that factor into the relationship between a journalist and White House official, falls under the purview of her reporting beat—because she was ‘jealous’ that an unidentified man in the past had ‘wanted to f***’ McCammond ‘and not you,’” the report added. “Ducklo also accused Palmeri of being ‘jealous’ of his relationship with McCammond.”

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said following the report that Ducklo has been suspended for a week over the incident.

“TJ Ducklo has apologized to the reporter, with whom he had a heated conversation about his personal life,” Psaki wrote on Twitter. “He is the first to acknowledge this is not the standard of behavior set out by the President.”

“In addition to his initial apology, he has sent the reporter a personal note expressing his profound regret,” she continued. “With the approval of the White House Chief of Staff, he has been placed on a one-week suspension without pay. In addition, when he returns, he will no longer be assigned to work with any reporters at Politico.”

Reporters called out the administration over the incident, highlighting how the Trump administration did not treat reporters that way as well as issues with the timeline of events with regard to the White House taking action to address the incident.

“The Vanity Fair piece indicates that Politico editors reached to the WH after the incident first occurred and the WH acknowledged it was inappropriate,” Spectator editor Amber Athey wrote on Twitter. “But they clearly didn’t have any interest in disciplining Ducklo until his behavior was made public.”

New York Magazine reporter Olivia Nuzzi wrote on Twitter: “I covered Donald Trump for 6 years. It is saying something that this behavior — from a Biden official — shocks me.”

Grabien founder Tom Elliott highlighted the following remarks that Biden made a few weeks ago: “If you’re ever working with me and I hear you treat another colleague with disrespect, talk down to someone, I promise you I will fire you on the spot, on the spot. No if, ands, or buts. Everybody — everybody is entitled to be treated with decency & dignity.”

CNN anchor Jake Tapper responded to the quote, writing: “Standards that are not upheld are not standards. They’re lies.”

Continue Reading

Trending Today