Dallas Soccer Star Calls Fans “Disgusting” for Booing and Chanting “USA!” as Players Knelt for National Anthem
Video Shows Mob of Women Attacking 17-Year-Old Chili’s Hostess Allegedly over Social Distancing Guidelines
WATCH: Harris Laughs Maniacally After Joking About Killing Trump, Pence
WATCH: Black Chicago Residents Interrupt BLM Rally To Support Looters, Demand BLM Leave Neighborhood
The federal appeals court gave a green light for Texas to enforce a new revised version of its voter identification law.
“The State has made a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits. SB5 allows voters without qualifying photo ID to cast regular ballots by executing a declaration that they face a reasonable impediment to obtaining qualifying photo ID. This declaration is made under the penalty of perjury,” Judges Jerry Smith and Jennifer Elrod wrote in a joint order Tuesday. “The State has made a strong showing that this reasonable-impediment procedure remedies plaintiffs’ alleged harm and thus forecloses plaintiffs’ injunctive relief.”
They criticized U.S. District Court Judge Nelva Gonzalez Ramos expanding the scope of the prior ruling instructing her to evaluate whether or not SB5 solved issues with SB14, another voter ID measure passed in Texas in 2011. Speculations were that the previous measure was an attempt to discriminate and that SB5 didn’t solve the issue.
“The district court went beyond the scope of the mandate on remand,” Smith and Elrod said. “Simply put, whether SB 5 should be enjoined — as opposed to whether it remedies SB 14’s ills — was not an issue before the district court on remand.”
“The third judge on the 5th Circuit panel handling Texas’ request to stay Ramos’ ruling, Judge James Graves Jr., said it was far from clear Texas would prevail. He noted that the 4th Circuit ruled last year that a North Carolina voter ID measure which the courts found was motivated by race was not adequately redressed by fixes to the law, and instead needed to be removed “root and branch.”
Graves also said preserving the status quo would mean returning to the procedures used during last year’s elections, rather than letting Texas go through with the process set up by the new law.
“If a stay is granted at all, then it should be comprehensive. In other words, the correct approach would be to stay both the district court’s order and the new legislation,” Graves said.
Lauren Ehrsam, a spokesperson for Trump’s Justice Department said they supported the ruling, stating that they were “pleased that the Fifth Circuit has stayed the injunction and allowed Texas to proceed with its duly enacted voter identification laws. Preserving the integrity of the ballot is vital to our democracy, and the Fifth Circuit’s order allows Texas to continue to fulfill that duty as this case moves forward.”
But this is not the end, the Civil rights activists can still intervene and request the Supreme Court to pause the improved voter id law, at least till the November elections are over.
Judge Jerry Smith is a Reagan appointee, Jennifer Elrod is a George W. Bush appointee, while James Graves and Nelva Gonzalez Ramos are Obama appointees.
Please share this post on Facebook with your thoughts.
What is your opinion on this? Scroll down to comment below!